Research Article |
Corresponding author: Colin J. Courtney Mustaphi ( ccour087@gmail.com ) Academic editor: Pavel Stoev
© 2016 Colin J. Courtney Mustaphi, Esther N. Githumbi, Lauren R. Shotter, Stephen M. Rucina, Rob Marchant.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Courtney Mustaphi CJ, Githumbi EN, Shotter LR, Rucina SM, Marchant R (2016) Subfossil statoblasts of Lophopodella capensis (Sollas, 1908) (Bryozoa, Phylactolaemata, Lophopodidae) in the Upper Pleistocene and Holocene sediments of a montane wetland, Eastern Mau Forest, Kenya. African Invertebrates 57(1): 39-52. https://doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.57.8191
|
Lophopodella capensis (Sollas, 1908) is only known from a limited number of palustrine and lacustrine sites in southern Africa and single sites in both Kenya and Israel. Statoblasts of L. capensis were found preserved in the Upper Pleistocene and Holocene aged sediments of Enapuiyapui wetland, Eastern Mau Forest, western Kenya. The wetland is a headwater microcatchment of tributaries that feed into the Mara River and the Lake Victoria Basin. Bryozoan taxa were not surveyed in a 2007 macroinvertebrate biodiversity assessment. The presence of L. capensis at this site marks the second observation of this taxon in Kenya, 65 km from Lake Naivasha, where observed prior, and in a location some 1000 meters higher. The results suggest Bryozoa should be included in aquatic biodiversity surveys that target these wetlands and that bryozoan remains should be incorporated into palaeoecological studies as useful palaeoenvironmental indicators.
Aquatic, biogeography, distribution, freshwater, fossil, statoblasts, subfossil, Mara River, palaeodistribution, palustrine, range
Lophopodella capensis (Sollas, 1908) (Bryozoa: Phylactolaemata: Lophopodidae) is a small Bryozoan that is epiphytic on stems and leaves and epilithic and occurs in freshwater to brackish waters, up to 9.4 pH in a temperature range of 18–25 °C (
Kiptunga Forest Block is located in the Eastern Mau Forest Block, Mau Narok County, Kenya, and is managed by a local Kenya Forest Service (KFS) station (Figure
The indigenous forest is diverse with abundant Afromontane taxa including Croton, Dombeya, Ficus, Juniperus, Olea spp., Podocarpus, Polyscias, Prunus and Schefflera, of which, remnant scattered minor pockets remain. Most of the indigenous forest has been cut and converted to agroforests by the 1930s (
The site is 65 km and just over 1000 m above Lake Naivasha, the nearest documented observation of L. capensis. Enapuiyapui (0°26'11.28"S, 35°47'58.74"E; 2920 m asl, Figures
The swamp is continuously covered by Cyperaceae-Poaceae dominated vegetation with patches of Juncaceae (Figures
On the 10–12 April, 2014, surface sediment samples were collected from 19 locations within the wet area of the swamp and the immediate surrounding region that has been ephemerally wet over the past century. To locate the thickest sediment accumulation area of the swamp to target for coring the complete stratigraphy, the wetland was first probed using fiberglass rods with multiple 1-m-long rod extensions. A 537 cm stratigraphy was collected near the swamp center using a hand pushed Russian D-shaped corer in 50 cm drives with approximately 10 cm overlapped sections (Figure
Subsamples of 1 cm3 were extracted at 1-cm intervals from 537 cm to the top and extracted from the wet core. Subsamples were put in a labelled beaker and soaked with a sodium hexametaphosphate solution (Na6P6O18) and drop of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) to disaggregate the samples and aid in the separation of the organic material and the clay particles (
The chronology of the stratigraphy was developed through radiocarbon dating, development of an age-depth model to assign ages to the sediment core depths, and stratigraphic zonation of the magnetic susceptibility data showed periods of significant change in the sediments. Nine samples of organic sediments and organic detritus were accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) radiocarbon dated and an age-depth model was produced and parameterization is described in the caption of Figure
BACON version 2.2 R program language script age-depth model for the Enapuiyapui stratigraphy using MCMC random walks (greyscale shading) through the probable radiocarbon dates (1σ age probability distributions represented in blue) that were calibrated using the IntCal13 curve (Table
The data reported in this paper have been deposited to the Harvard Dataverse repository (
The basal date for the sediment stratigraphy was 16600 yr BP and represented the onset of organic sediment accumulation that has continued to present (Figure
Age determinations for the 537 cm Enapuiyapui Swamp stratigraphy. *1σ error. pMC, percent modern carbon, defined as 1950 common era by 14C activity standard. ** Dates that were excluded from the age-depth modelling.
Depth (cm) | Age (14C years)* | pMC* | δ13CVPDB (±0.1 ‰) | Material | Laboratory ID |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | –64 | Top of core | |||
30–31 | 201 ± 23 | 97.53 ± 0.28 | –27.3 | Picked organics | D-AMS-009664 |
50–51 | 2449 ± 35 | 73.72 ± 0.32 | –23.5 | Bulk sieved <63 μm | SUERC-57340** |
74–76 | 1865 ± 37 | 17.58 ± 0.13 | >63μm charcoal | UBA-27553 | |
100–101 | 10721 ± 47 | 26.33 ± 0.15 | Bulk sediment | UBA-26117** | |
128–129 | 7616 ± 33 | 38.75 ± 0.16 | –24.5 | Picked organics | D-AMS-009663 |
230–231 | 9837 ± 42 | 29.39 ± 0.15 | Bulk sediment | UBA-26118 | |
315–316 | 13963 ± 60 | 17.58 ± 0.13 | Bulk sediment | UBA-27554** | |
537 | 13692 ± 83 | 18.19 ± 0.19 | Bulk sediment | UBA-26116 (Base) |
The examination of 19 surface sediment samples collected in April 2014 did not yield any Phylactolaemata remains from any location within the wetland (Table
Surface sediment sampling locations and volume of wet sediment analysed for L. capensis remains.
ID | Latitude | Longitude | Volume (cm3) |
---|---|---|---|
NB 1 | -0°26.226' | 35°47.870' | 1 |
NB 2 | -0°26.196' | 35°47.892' | 1 |
NB 3 | -0°26.242' | 35°47.891' | 1 |
NB 4 | -0°26.232' | 35°47.954' | 1 |
NB 5 | -0°26.235' | 35°47.995' | 1 |
NB 6 | -0°26.231' | 35°48.025' | 1 |
NB 7 | -0°26.224' | 35°48.044' | 1 |
NB 8 | -0°26.221' | 35°47.888' | 1 |
NB 9 | -0°26.190' | 35°47.959' | 1 |
NB 10 | -0°26.197' | 35°47.940' | 1 |
NB 11 | -0°26.218' | 35°47.922' | 1 |
NB 12 | -0°26.199' | 35°47.903' | 1 |
NB 13 | -0°26.178' | 35°47.889' | 1 |
NB 14 | -0°26.175' | 35°47.906' | 1 |
NB 15 | -0°26.176' | 35°47.923' | 1 |
NB 16 | -0°26.177' | 35°47.935' | 1 |
NB 17 | -0°26.163' | 35°47.947' | 1 |
NB 18 | -0°26.133' | 35°47.919' | 1 |
NB 19 | -0°26.121' | 35°47.908' | 1 |
Depth intervals and modeled ages of presence of L. capensis remains presented as concentrations of statoblasts per volume of wet sediment.
Depth interval (cm) | Age interval (yr BP) | L. capensis statoblasts per cm3 |
---|---|---|
16–17 | 117.6–129.7 | 2 |
20–21 | 166.1–177.1 | 1 |
21–22 | 177.1–188.5 | 1 |
22–23 | 188.5–199.8 | 1 |
23–24 | 199.8–210.9 | 3 |
25–26 | 221.9–233.8 | 1 |
26–27 | 233.8–245.7 | 2 |
41–42 | 670–711.6 | 1 |
331–332 | 13058.4–13075.3 | 1 |
344–345 | 13285–13302.3 | 1 |
465–466 | 15392.7–15410.4 | 1 |
480–481 | 15655.3–15671.8 | 6 |
481–482 | 15671.8–15688.3 | 4 |
Neither Lophopodella capensis nor other Phylactolaemata taxa were encountered in a macroinvertebrate survey conducted across the swamp in April 2007 (
Lophopodella capensis statoblasts and organic detritus, including charcoal at right, from the sieved sediment subsample from25–26 cm stratigraphic depth, dated to 220–230 yr BP (5). A well preserved statoblast observed at 41–42 cm, dated to 670–711 (6). Pleistocene-aged statoblast from 480–481 cm, dated to 15600–15700 (7). Same specimen as Fig.
Additional radiocarbon dates of the sediment stratigraphy could further constrain the presence data of this taxon. We suggest that presence data of bryozoan macroremains, including the resistant chitinous statoblasts and floatoblasts be examined in other sedimentological studies in East Africa (
We thank County Forest Coordinator Samuel Mukundi, forester Dennis K. Mbogo (retired), and KFS askari for permission and help accessing the wetland. We also thank three local men and volunteers from TimSales Ltd. for coring aid and Rebecca M. Muthoni for field work. We thank the British Institute in Eastern Africa (Nairobi) and the late Joseph Mutua for logistical support and acknowledge Denis Odera (NACOSTI) and Margaret Omoto (NMK) for help with research and export permits. Roland Gehrels graciously permitted use of microscope equipment and Henry Lamb aided with ITRAX, RGB, and magnetic susceptibility scanning. Maria Gehrels prepared the digital microscopy photographs. We thank Timothy S. Wood for his encouragement and guidance on the identification and distributions of L. capensis and for commenting on manuscript drafts. We also thank Professor Beth Okamura for her constructive review of this manuscript, which improved the clarity of the paper and advanced the discussion section. This research was funded by Resilience in East African Landscapes (REAL), a European Commission Marie Curie Initial Training Network grant to RM (FP7-PEOPLE-2013-ITN project number 606879).