Research Article |
Corresponding author: Harriet Kinga ( harrietkinga@gmail.com ) Academic editor: John Midgley
© 2025 Harriet Kinga, Frederick Gyasi Damptey, Danilo Harms, Rudy Jocqué, Arnaud Henrard, Klaus Birkhofer.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Kinga H, Damptey FG, Harms D, Jocqué R, Henrard A, Birkhofer K (2025) Active restoration of post-mining forest benefits the activity density, but not the diversity of spider communities across the seasons in Ghana. African Invertebrates 66(1): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.66.138662
|
Forest restoration often involves monitoring programmes to determine whether biodiversity levels and ecosystem services have changed over time. This study investigated changes in ground-hunting spider communities (families Ctenidae, Lycosidae and Zodariidae) in an actively restored forest, an unrestored gravel mine, and two alternative land-use types (agroforestry system and an arable field) to assess whether a two-decade post-mine restoration programme has been successful in restoring biodiversity to levels of a reference natural forest. The overall activity density of ground-hunting spiders (based on both juveniles and adult specimens) was highest in the natural and the restored forest in the dry season and lowest in the arable field and agroforestry system in the wet season. The inverse Simpson index was highest at the gravel site in the wet season, followed by natural forest in both seasons and lower values in the restored forest. The community composition of spiders differed significantly between land-use types (open versus forest habitats) and the interaction between land use and season also differed significantly. The species Pardosa injucunda and Trochosa gentilis dominated the communities in the restored forest, but Africactenus monitor dominated the natural forest and Hogna gratiosa dominated communities in the gravel site. Surprisingly, active forest restoration promoted the activity density of ground-hunting spiders displaced by mining activities to levels even higher than in the reference natural forest after two decades. However, the community composition of the restored forest was more similar to the agroforestry system than to the natural forest. These results highlight the benefits of restoring former mining sites but also show the trade-offs in terms of restoration goals, as natural forest biodiversity of spiders was not achieved after 20 years.
Agroforestry system, Araneae, biodiversity conservation, community composition, deforestation, mining
Global deforestation rates continue unabated, with the majority of deforestation occurring in tropical regions that are home to primary forests and rich in biodiversity (
Historically, restoration monitoring in Ghana has often focused on the use of a few indicators such as tree species composition and diversity (
Here, we focus on spiders (Arachnida, Araneae) and their potential role as indicators of restoration success. Spiders are the dominant predators in terrestrial arthropod food webs (
Among spiders, some taxa are known to be restricted to more open habitats such as Lycosidae Sundevall, 1833 (
The study was conducted in Ghana in the Ahafo region (Fig.
The Terchire Restoration Area (restored forest; RF), which covers an area of 15.4 ha (7°14.075'N, 2°10.842'W), was exploited for gravel for road construction until 1998 and was actively restored in 1999 by planting indigenous and fast-growing exotic nitrogen-fixing tree seedlings (
The five land-use types were studied in both seasons (dry and wet) using eight replicated 20 × 20 m plots, resulting in 40 study plots across the five land uses. Ground spider communities were sampled continuously, with five pitfall traps on each plot emptied weekly for 10 weeks in each sampling season. The first sampling campaign was conducted in the dry season (January to March 2019), followed by a rainy season campaign (June to August 2019). Pitfall traps were filled with a 50:50 mixture of ethylene glycol and water, and all pitfall traps were covered with small roofs to prevent the dilution of the trapping fluid by rain (
In West Africa, most spider species have yet to be described, making it difficult to identify adults to species level due to the lack of taxonomic keys. To overcome this obstacle, the limited literature available (
The overall activity density of spiders was based on the total catch of both juvenile and adult spiders in the families Ctenidae, Lycosidae and Zodariidae. The multivariate species composition of ground-hunting spider community focused only on the composition of identified species in these three families. The multivariate species composition of spider communities in different land uses and seasons, as well as the interaction term between land use and the season, was analysed using permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) based on log(x+1) transformed activity densities of all species from the selected families and Bray-Curtis similarities (
A total of 1852 individual spiders from five land-use types (natural forest, agroforestry system, restored forest, arable field and gravel sites) and across two seasons (wet and dry) were identified in the three families. A total of 29 species, comprising 804 males, 397 females and 651 juveniles were identified from the following families: Ctenidae (7 species), Lycosidae (12) and Zodariidae (7) (Appendix
The overall activity density of spiders differed significantly between land uses and seasons, and the interaction term between land uses and seasons was also significant (Table
PERMANOVA results for the effect of the land use and season on the A) overall activity density, B) inverse Simpson index (Hill number 2) and C) multivariate species composition of spider communities (df: degree of freedom; SS: sum of squares, MS: mean sum of squares, Pseudo-F: F value by permutation, P(perm): P-values based on 9999. Significant effects are in bold.
A) Activity dens. | df | SS | MS | Pseudo-F | P(perm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Plot | 35 | 4257.90 | 121.65 | 1.64 | 0.072 |
Land use | 4 | 6057.3 | 1514.3 | 12.448 | 0.001 |
Season | 1 | 806.45 | 806.45 | 10.844 | 0.002 |
Land-use x Season | 4 | 907.68 | 226.92 | 3.0513 | 0.031 |
Res | 35 | 2602.9 | 74.368 | ||
Total | 79 | 14632 | |||
B) Inv. Simpson | df | SS | MS | Pseudo-F | P(perm) |
Plot | 35 | 24.76 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.890 |
Land use | 4 | 47.79 | 11.95 | 16.89 | 0.001 |
Season | 1 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.22 | 0.639 |
Land-use x Season | 4 | 12.50 | 3.12 | 2.91 | 0.037 |
Res | 35 | 37.64 | 1.08 | ||
Total | 79 | 122.91 | |||
C) Species comp. | df | SS | MS | Pseudo-F | P(perm) |
Plot | 35 | 50118.00 | 1431.90 | 1.35 | 0.016 |
Land use | 4 | 78157.00 | 19539.00 | 13.65 | 0.001 |
Season | 1 | 2235.60 | 2235.60 | 2.10 | 0.059 |
Land-use x Season | 4 | 8211.40 | 2052.80 | 1.93 | 0.008 |
Res | 35 | 37175.00 | 1062.10 | ||
Total | 79 | 175900.00 |
Overall activity density (A) and inverse Simpson index (B) (Hill number 2) of spiders for interactions between land-use types (NF, natural forest; AS, agroforestry system; AF, arable field; GS, gravel site; and RF, restored forest) and season (W, wet; D, dry). Single points indicate outliers based on the Median and Interquartile Deviation Method (IQD), the horizontal line is the median, boxes are 25th and 75th percentiles and whiskers show the 90th and 10th percentile respectively.
The inverse Simpson index differed significantly between land uses, but not between seasons and the interaction term between land uses and seasons was significant (Table
The species composition of spider communities differed between land-use types but not between seasons and the interaction term between land uses and season was also significant (Table
Communities in the restored forest differed by 64% from the arable field with Amicactenus eminens (Arts, 1912), Africactenus monitor (Steyn & Jocqué, 2003), Mallinella sp3, and Pardosa injucunda (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1876) having higher activity densities in the restored forest and with Anahita lineata (Simon, 1897) only present in the restored forest, but absent in the arable field. Furthermore, the communities in the restored forest differed by 68% from the gravel site with Mallinella sp3, P. injucunda and Trochosa gentilis (Roewer, 1960) having higher activity densities in the restored forest (Fig.
Box plots for activity densities of spider species across land-use types: NF, natural forest; AS, agroforestry system; AF, arable field; GS, gravel site; and RF, restored forest. Single points indicate outliers based on the Median and Interquartile Deviation Method (IQD), the horizontal line is the median, boxes are 25th and 75th percentiles and whiskers show the 90th and 10th percentile respectively.
Spider community composition differed by 68% between the restored forest and the gravel site, but the differences were mainly driven by the activity densities of the seven most common species. Higher activity densities of Mallinella sp3, P. injucunda, and T. gentilis were observed in the restored forest than in the gravel site while M. bandamaensis, H. gratiosa, H. duala, and Hippasosa pilosa (Alderweireldt, 1996) had higher activity densities at the gravel site. Communities in the reference natural forest differed by 61% from the restored forest with A. eminens, A. monitor, Mallinella sp1, Mallinella sp3 and having higher activity densities in the natural forest, and A. lineata, present only in the restored but not in the natural forest.
Species composition of spider communities only showed a statistical trend for differences between the wet and dry seasons and with the wet season characterised by higher activity densities of H. duala, H. gratiosa, P. injucunda, and T. gentilis (Fig.
Box plots for activity densities of spider species across seasons (wet and dry). Single points indicate outliers based on the Median and Interquartile Deviation Method (IQD), the horizontal line is the median, boxes are 25th and 75th percentiles and whiskers show the 90th and 10th percentile respectively.
Ground-hunting spider communities in the restored forest reached activity densities similar to the reference natural forest, but the diversity and species composition differed from the natural forest communities and were more similar to communities in the agroforestry system. Several environmental factors such as seasonality, habitat conditions, environmental stability, competition, predation (
Natural and restored forests had higher activity densities than the unrestored gravel mine and the alternative land uses (arable field and agroforestry system). These forest systems have a more complex structure (
However, it is surprising to see a high inverse Simpson index of spiders in the gravel site where such habitat conditions are less diverse and low diversity in the restored forest. The inverse Simpson index is sensitive to changes in the most abundant species in a community (
The observed differences in activity density between land uses depending on seasons illustrate how seasonal variations affect spider communities in the Afrotropical region where seasonality is highly pronounced. Seasonal factors such as rainfall and temperature drive habitat conditions and subsequent temporal variation in species assemblages (
Spider species composition in forests is largely determined by the diversity of tree species and the vegetation characteristics of habitats, which align with prey densities (
The gradient in community composition observed from the gravel site through the restored to the natural forest highlights the differences in spider communities between the land-use types. The natural forest had a unique spider community, probably driven by its habitat conditions characterised by old forest stands, deadwood and a diverse tree community (
The unique homogeneous habitat characteristic of the gravel site supported specialised species such as Hogna gratiosa, and Mallinella bandamaensis that are often found in open habitats. Mallinella bandamaensis, for example, prefers open degraded habitats and the species is well adapted to hunting prey in such habitats. The unique community of the arable field was dominated by Pardosa injucunda and Trochosa gentilis as additional species, showing preferences for open and disturbed environments (
The restored forest had a spider community with a mix of species from the different land-use types. For example, Mallinella sp3, Pardosa injucunda, and Trochosa gentilis, which characterised the communities in the restored forest, were also observed in the natural forest, agroforestry system and the arable field. This reflects the development stage of the restored forest in terms of biodiversity mimicking spider communities from both the historical stage prior to restoration (gravel site) and the reference land-use types (natural forest).
Spider communities differed between land-use types depending on seasons, with activity densities, but not diversity or species composition, with the restored forest resembling the natural forest. The species composition of the communities in the restored forest was dissimilar to those in the gravel site and arable field, confirming the intermediate state between these land uses and natural forest. These results highlight the benefits of restoring former mining sites, but also the trade-offs in terms of restoration objectives, as natural forest biodiversity was not achieved after 20 years in restoration approaches that also aimed to provide direct benefits to local human communities (agroforestry system and actively restored forest). Nevertheless, it is clear from our results that restoration strategies are effective at increasing activity densities and certainly more effective from a conservation point of view than leaving degraded systems unmanaged and unable to self-recover.
We are grateful to Newmont Gold Ghana Limited and the Forest Service Division of Ghana for providing FGD permission to carry out this research. We appreciate the contribution of Daniel Kwame Debrah during the fieldwork. We also appreciate the assistance of Nadine Dupérré (Museum of Nature Hamburg – Zoology, Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change (LIB) Hamburg) for assisting with identification of spiders to family and Peter Jaeger (Senkenberg Natural History Museum, Frankfurt) in facilitating the examination of type specimens during identification. We are also grateful to the Rufford Foundation for funding HK’s (39660-1) field campaign in Ghana.
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The non-invasive sampling methods did not harm or endanger trees and other animals.
We declare that no financial support was received from Newmont Gold Ghana Limited.
Harriet Kinga: Conceptualization, methodology, investigation, taxonomy, data curation, formal analysis, writing. Frederick Gyasi Damptey: Conceptualization, methodology, investigation, formal analysis, writing. Danilo Harms: Conceptualization, taxonomy, formal analysis, writing. Arnaud Henrard: Taxonomy, writing. Rudy Jocqué: Taxonomy, writing. Klaus Birkhofer: Conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, writing.
Harriet Kinga https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3898-4274
Frederick Gyasi Damptey https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5732-8814
Danilo Harms https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7437-6897
Rudy Jocqué https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1776-0121
Arnaud Henrard https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3270-7193
All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.
Family | Species | Agroforestry | Arable Field | Gravel Site | Natural Forest | Restored Forest | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ctenidae | Africactenus monitor Steyn & Jocqué, 2003 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 24 | 8 | 35 |
Africactenus sp. | 1 | 1 | 8 | 10 | |||
Amicactenus eminens Arts, 1912 | 2 | 13 | 9 | 24 | |||
Amicactenus fallax Steyn & Van der Donckt, 2003 | 4 | 4 | |||||
Amicactenus sp. | 10 | 2 | 13 | 12 | 37 | ||
Anahita aculeata Simon, 1897 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
Anahita lineata Simon, 1897 | 6 | 1 | 16 | 23 | |||
Anahita sp. | 6 | 2 | 3 | 26 | 15 | 52 | |
Petaloctenus bossema Jocqué & Steyn, 1997 | 3 | 3 | |||||
Petaloctenus sp. | 2 | 12 | 2 | 16 | |||
Piloctenus mirificus Arts, 1912 | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||
Lycosidae | Alopecosa sp.n | 6 | 1 | 2 | 9 | ||
Geolycosa sp.n | 1 | 1 | |||||
Hippasa albopunctata Thorell, 1899 | 5 | 1 | 6 | ||||
Hippasa lamtoensis Dresco, 1981 | 1 | 1 | |||||
Hippasa sp. | 2 | 2 | |||||
Hippasa brechti Alderweireldt & Jocqué, 2005 | 4 | 1 | 5 | ||||
Hippasosa pilosa Roewer, 1960 | 14 | 1 | 2 | 17 | |||
Hippasosa sp. | 1 | 2 | 25 | 6 | 34 | ||
Hogna duala Roewer, 1959 | 2 | 18 | 1 | 12 | 33 | ||
Hogna gratiosa Roewer, 1959 | 41 | 4 | 45 | ||||
Hogna simoni Roewer, 1959 | 2 | 6 | 8 | ||||
Hogna sp. | 4 | 13 | 4 | 5 | 26 | ||
Pardosa injucunda O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1876 | 106 | 56 | 71 | 32 | 253 | 518 | |
Pardosa sp. | 25 | 23 | 48 | 55 | 38 | 189 | |
Trochosa gentilis Roewer, 1960 | 11 | 67 | 38 | 22 | 74 | 212 | |
Trochosa mundamea Roewer, 1960 | 2 | 3 | 5 | ||||
Trochosa sp. | 3 | 13 | 27 | 6 | 17 | 66 | |
Zodariidae | Dusmadiores sp.n | 1 | 1 | ||||
Mallinella bandamaensis Jézéquel, 1964 | 27 | 1 | 48 | 3 | 15 | 94 | |
Mallinella sp. | 11 | 2 | 12 | 21 | 18 | 64 | |
Mallinella sp1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 40 | 1 | 45 | |
Mallinella sp2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 12 | ||
Mallinella sp3 | 30 | 2 | 148 | 45 | 225 | ||
Mallinella sp4 | 4 | 4 | |||||
Mallinella sp5 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 21 |