Catalogue
Print
Catalogue
Tabanidae (Diptera) holotypes in the KwaZulu-Natal Museum collection: Part 2. Diachlorini and Tabanini
expand article infoKirstin A. Williams§, Louwrens P. Snyman|
‡ KwaZulu-Natal Museum, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
§ Rhodes University, Makhanda, South Africa
| Royal Alberta Museum, Edmonton, Canada
¶ University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
Open Access

Abstract

All primary (name-bearing) and secondary types (paratypes) of Bartolomeudiasiella, Cydistomyia and Limata within the tribe Diachlorini and Hybomitra, Tabanus and Therioplectes within the tribe Tabanini, deposited in the KwaZulu-Natal Museum (NMSA) are documented: Cydistomyia (Amanella) cooksoni Usher, 1965; Cydistomyia (Amanella) grayi (Oldroyd, 1957), comb. nov.; Cydistomyia (Amanella) ignota Usher, 1965; Cydistomyia (Amanella) ingridina Usher, 1965; Cydistomyia (Amanella) shaka Usher, 1970; Cydistomyia (Amanella) zimbiti Usher, 1970; Limata kuhnelti Usher, 1967 [now Bartolomeudiasiella kuhnelti (Usher, 1967)]; Limata miranda Usher, 1968; Limata parafacialis Oldroyd, 1957; Tabanus crocodilinus Austen, 1912; Tabanus flavicoxa Usher, 1954; Tabanus nefas Usher, 1971; Tabanus postacutus Oldroyd, 1947; Tabanus saxicolus Usher, 1965 [now Hybomitra saxicolus (Usher, 1965)]; Therioplectes zumpti (Dias, 1956). The reference to the original publication, including the original name, the type locality and the collector, is provided for each species. In addition, brief remarks and colour photographs are provided. This is the second in a series of publications on the primary types of the Tabanidae of the KwaZulu-Natal Museum.

Key words:

Horse fly, insect collection, NMSA, paratype, type specimen

Introduction

The entomology collection of the KwaZulu-Natal Museum (KZNM) consists of approximately 250 000 specimens. It is one of the largest and most representative collections of Afrotropical flies in the southern hemisphere. The Entomology Department was established when Dr B. R. Stuckenberg was appointed in 1953 and is largely Diptera biased (Barraclough and Whittington 1994). The collection has grown through both extensive collecting in southern Africa and the acquisition of other significant regional collections. Acquisition of the Ditsong Museum of Natural History’s (previously Transvaal MuseumTMSA) Diptera collection in 1975, through exchange, was especially significant, as was obtaining the Fritz Zumpt collection by donation in 1983. At the time of the donation, the Zumpt collection was housed at the South African Institute of Medical Research (SAIMR) (Barraclough and Whittington 1994).

To date, the entomology collection of KZNM contains more than 2000 primary types and more than 11700 secondary Diptera types. The collection is housed in almost 1000 insect drawers and includes an alcohol and slide collection.

The KZNM has one of the largest Tabanidae collections in southern Africa (Snyman et al. 2020) and is completely digitised. While tabanids, as vectors of pathogens, are important for both veterinary and medical reasons, some species are also important pollinators (Johnson and Steiner 1997; Johnson and Morita 2006; Baldacchino et al. 2014, 2017). The KZNM collection contains 40 primary and 118 secondary tabanid types representing 11 genera. The collection played an important part in the development of the Oldroyd monographs throughout the 1950s (Oldroyd 1952, 1954, 1957). Subsequently, Pamela Stuckenberg (nèe Usher) actively worked on the collection in the 1960s and 1970s (Barraclough and Whittington 1994).

The challenges associated with unreliable postal services and the costs associated with posting specimens to researchers and institutions around the world have resulted in many institutions refusing to send type specimens on loan. As mitigation, the digitisation of museum records and generating type catalogues that include good quality photos is imperative. It allows researchers digital access to important specimens when travel and/or research funding is not available to physically view the specimens.

Misidentifications of Tabanidae in recent publications have raised concern about the utility of sequences in molecular libraries (Williams et al. 2022). Tabanidae can be difficult to identify, and due to their economic, medical and veterinary importance, image-rich catalogues of type specimens are an invaluable research tool. Hopefully, type catalogues such as this will assist in identifications and have positive knock-on effects that may increase the accuracy of molecular libraries and reduce identification ambiguity in vector biology.

This is the second in a series of publications aimed at increasing the accessibility of the primary types of the Tabanidae housed in the KZNM. The first publication dealt with the primary types of the Haematopotini (Williams and Snyman 2021). Here, the types of the remaining Tabaninae species housed in the KZNM collection are included. The Diachlorini in the KwaZulu-Natal Museum collection are represented by three genera – Bartolomeudiasiella Travassos Santos Dias, 1987, Cydistomyia Taylor, 1919 and Limata Oldroyd, 1954. The Tabanini type specimens are also represented by three genera – Hybomitra Enderlein, 1922, Tabanus Linnaeus 1758 and Therioplectes Zeller, 1842. The holotypes of these genera are presented in an image-rich catalogue, including information on the paratypes. Information is provided on the species with comments pertaining to the taxonomy and physical condition of the specimens.

Methods and materials

Photographs of all the specimens were taken with a Nikon D3200 digital SLR with an AF-D Micro Nikkor 105 mm 1:2.8G lens. Helicon Focus 8 software was used to stack the images and Photopea online software was used to do colour correction. Photo plates of the images were produced in Corel PaintShop Pro vX8.

The label information for each holotype states the new country or province names in square brackets where appropriate. Additional information about the locality from the original publication that is not on the labels, is provided in braces. The GPS co-ordinates provided for the holotype localities were obtained from a gazetteer. The label data of all specimens are digitised as per Darwin Core and available on the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF - https://www.gbif.org/).

List of primary and secondary types

Tribe Diachlorini

Genus Cydistomyia Taylor, 1919: 47. Type species: Cydistomyia doddi Taylor, 1919.

Subgenus Amanella Oldroyd, 1954: 75 (as genus). Type species: Tabanus imbecillus Karsch, 1887.

Genus Limata Oldroyd, 1954: 67. Type species: Tabanus tenicornis Macquart, 1838.

Cydistomyia (Amanella) cooksoni Usher, 1965: 80 fig. 15.

Holotype. S. Rhodesia [Zimbabwe] • ♀; N. Vumba, {Umtali District}, D. Cookson, 27.10.63; NMSA-Dip 032228; 18°19'0"S, 29°50'0"E; type number 1901. Fig. 1.

Figure 1. 

Cydistomyia (Amanella) cooksoni holotype A dorsal B lateral C head D ventral E wing F–H paratypes F NMSA-DIP 137592 G NMSA-DIP 137593 H NMSA-DIP 032252. Scale bars: 2 mm.

Paratypes. • 1 ♂ and 1 ♀, 27.10.63 and 10.11.63 respectively, from the same locality.

Current status. Cydistomyia (Amanella) cooksoni, Usher, 1965; original combination.

Remarks. There is a spelling error on the holotype label – the species name is spelt “cooskoni’. The publication of the original description lists two paratypes – a male with the collection date 27.10.63 and a female with a collection date of 10.11.63, both from N. Vumba. There are, however, three paratypes in the collection from N. Vumba — one female with a collection date of 27.X.63, and two males, one with the collection date 10.11.63 and a second with the collection date 11.10.64. The condition of the holotype specimen is fair. The head of the specimen is glued to a card that is pinned below the specimen. Both the flagella are broken off.

Cydistomyia (Canalicula) grayi Oldroyd, 1957: 473 no figs.

Holotype. Malawi • ♀; Baltic Estate, Blantyre, W.J. Gray. October to November; 16°4'13"S, 35°8'49"E; in British Museum (NMHUK).

Paratypes. • 7 ♀ same locality as holotype, 1 ♀ Cholo, Nyasaland [Malawi], R.C. Wood, 1.XI.26; in KwaZulu-Natal Museum, NMSA-DIP 042270; type number 367. Fig. 2.

Figure 2. 

Cydistomyia (Amanella) grayi paratype – NMSA-DIP 042270. Scale bar: 2 mm.

Current status. Cydistomyia (Amanella) grayi (Oldroyd, 1957); new combination.

Remarks. Canalicula was originally described as a subgenus of Amanella by Oldroyd (1954) alongside Amanella (Amanella). Amanella, as genus, was later synonomised with the genus Cydistomyia by Mackerras (1964, pp. 96–99). Usher (1965), however, retained Amanella as a subgenus of Cydistomyia, but did not find any support to retain any further subdivision or to include Canalicula as a separate subgenus. Cydistomyia grayi, originally assigned to the subgenus Canalicula should therefore be transferred to Cydistomyia (Amanella).

There are seven female paratypes listed in the publication with the same locality information as the holotype but no indication of where they are deposited. According to the Natural History Museum, London (NHMUK) website, there are five paratypes in their collection, all with identical collection data. There is one paratype from a different locality listed in the publication that is deposited in the KZNM collection. The specimen is in good condition. The depository location of the remaining paratypes is unknown.

Cydistomyia (Amanella) ignota Usher, 1965: 77 figs 14b, 16m, n, 17b.

Holotype. South Africa • ♀; {Eastern Transvaal} [Limpopo] Haenertsburg, 24–31.XII.1921; C. J. Swierstra; NMSA-Dip 055013; 23°56'S, 29°57'E; type number 1900. Fig. 3

Figure 3. 

Cydistomyia (Amanella) ignota holotype A dorsal B ventral C lateral D head. Scale bars: 2 mm.

Current status. Cydistomyia (Amanella) ignota Usher, 1965; original combination.

Remarks. According to the original publication, this specimen was deposited in the Transvaal Museum. The Transvaal Museum’s (now Ditsong Museum of Natural History - TMSA) Diptera collection was obtained by the Natal Museum (now KZNM) by an exchange in 1975. The holotype is the only type specimen, as no paratypes are listed. The specimen is in good condition except for a missing portion of the left foreleg.

Cydistomyia (Amanella) ingridina Usher, 1965: 75 figs 14d, 16e, g, 17a.

Holotype. South Africa • ♀; Natal [KwaZulu-Natal] Gillitts, Pinetown district, B & P. Stuckenberg, 14-2-62; NMSA-Dip 053216; 29°48'S, 30°48'E; type number 1899. Fig. 4.

Figure 4. 

Cydistomyia (Amanella) ingridina holotype A dorsal B lateral C head D ventral. Scale bars: 2 mm.

Current status. Cydistomyia (Amanella) ingridina Usher, 1965; original combination.

Remarks. The publication adds “from the upper Empolweni Valley” to the location of the holotype. It lists a paratype from the same location, collected on 20 December 1962, but does not state where it was deposited. The paratype is not in the KZNM collection and is not listed on the NHMUK website. The holotype is in good condition.

Cydistomyia (Amanella) shaka Usher, 1970: 334 figs 6–9.

Holotype. South Africa • ♀; Natal [KwaZulu-Natal] Pateni Estates, Richmond, B Stuckenberg, XI-68. NMSA-Dip 055552; 29°56'S, 30°9'E; type number 1888. Fig. 5.

Figure 5. 

Cydistomyia (Amanella) shaka holotype A dorsal B lateral C head D venral E wing. Scale bars: 2 mm.

Current status. Cydistomyia (Amanella) shaka Usher, 1970; original combination.

Remarks. The holotype is in good condition.

Cydistomyia (Amanella) zimbiti Usher, 1970: 329 figs 1–5.

Holotype. South Africa • ♀ Natal [KwaZulu-Natal] Zimbiti Forest, 7 miles north-east of Kranskop, November 1967, P. J. and B. R. Stuckenberg; NMSA-Dip 055784; 28°53'10"S, 30°56'22"E; type number 1887. Fig. 6.

Figure 6. 

Cydistomyia (Amanella) zimbiti holotype A dorsal B lateral C head D vental E wing F–H paratypes F NMSA-DIP 137743 G NMSA-DIP 137744 H NMSA-DIP 137745. Scale bars: 2 mm.

Paratypes. Four ♀ with the same collecting information as holotype.

Current status. Cydistomyia (Amanella) zimbiti Usher, 1970; original combination.

Remarks. The publication lists a holotype, an allotype and four paratypes. There is no allotype and only three paratypes in the KZNM collection. There is no information regarding the allotype or other paratype and their current depository location is unknown. The holotype is in good condition.

Limata kuhnelti Usher, 1967: 603 figs 7–9.

Holotype. South West Africa [Namibia] • ♀; Gobabeb, 1 March 1964; NMSA-Dip 052588; 23°33'S, 15°2'E type number 1140. Fig. 7.

Figure 7. 

Bartolomeudiasiella kuhnelti holotype A dorsal B lateral C head D ventral. Scale bars: 2 mm.

Current status. Bartolomeudiasiella kuhnelti (Usher, 1967); transferred to Bartolomeudiasiella in Travassos Santos Dias (1990).

Remarks. The publication states that the holotype was collected by Professor W. Kühnelt of Vienna University, at the Namib Desert Research Station in Gobabeb. A publication by Travassos Santos Dias (1990) transferred kuhnelti to a new genus, as Bartolomeudiasiella kuhnelti — a senior synonym of Bartolomeudiasiella atlanticus. However, this new combination seems to have been overlooked, and is currently not recognised by the online checklist databases, Catalogue of Life, GBIF or Systema Dipterorum. The antennae of the holotype are broken, the right wing is folded and the abdomen is damaged. There are no paratypes listed for this species.

Limata miranda Usher, 1968: 29 figs 13–16.

Holotype. South Africa • ♀; Eastern Cape Province; Hogsback north of Alice; 2–3 November 1964; B & P Stuckenberg; NMSA-Dip 052841; 32°35'S, 27°5'E; type number 386. Fig. 8.

Figure 8. 

Limata miranda holotype A dorsal B lateral C wing D head E ventral. Scale bars: 2 mm.

Current status. Limata miranda Usher, 1968; original combination.

Remarks. The publication lists a female holotype and a male specimen (not designated type status) deposited in the Natal Museum (KZNM). There are, however, no male specimens in the collection. The male was reportedly collected in Zimbaba Forest in the Kranskop District. Usher lists several differences between the male and the female holotype stating that it might be the male of another species (Usher 1968). The holotype is in good condition. There are no paratypes for this species.

Limata parafacialis Oldroyd, 1957: 469 no figs.

Holotype. South Africa • ♀; Eastern Cape Province, Grahamstown, 16.12-1936; R.C. Wood; 33°18'33"S, 26°31'42"E; in British Museum (NHMUK).

Paratypes.• Eastern Cape Province, Sheldon; in the KwaZulu-Natal Museum. NMSA-DIP 050517; NMSA-DIP 141811; NMSA-DIP 141812 type number 929. Fig. 9.

Figure 9. 

Limata parafacialis paratypes A NMSA-DIP 050517 B NMSA-DIP 141811 C NMSA-DIP 141812. Scale bars: 2 mm.

Current status. Limata parafacialis Usher, 1968; original combination.

Remarks. There are six female paratypes listed in the publication that were reportedly deposited in the South African Institute for Medical Research (SAIMR) in Johannesburg, South Africa. The Natal Museum (now KZNM) obtained part of the fly collection of the SAIMR by donation in 1983. There are only three paratypes in the KZNM collection. The remaining three paratypes are listed on the Natural History Museum, London (NHMUK) website as being in their collection, along with the holotype. There is no collection date or collector name on any of the paratype specimens housed at KZNM. One paratype is missing a head, another has a damaged wing and the third paratype is missing a flagellum.

Tribe Tabanini

Genus Hybomitra Enderlein, 1922: 347. Type species Hybomitra solox Enderlein, 1922.

Genus Tabanus Linnaeus, 1758: 601. Type species Tabanus bovinus Linnaeus by subsequent designation of Latreille 1810: 443.

Genus Therioplectes Zeller, 1842: 1819. Type species Tabanus tricolor Zeller by subsequent designation of Coquillett 1910: 614.

Tabanus crocodilinus Austen, 1912: 284 no figs.

Holotype. Nyasaland [Malawi] • ♀; Lufira River, North Nayasa, 6.viii.1909, J.B. Davey; 9°48'33"S, 33°44'49"E; in British Museum (NHMUK).

Paratype. Nyasaland [Malawi], • Lufira River, N. Nayasa, 6.viii.1909, J.B. Davey; in KwaZulu-Natal Museum. NMSA-DIP 053624 type number 369. Fig. 10a, b.

Figure 10. 

A, B Tabanus crocodilinus paratype – NSMA-DIP 053624 C Tabanus flavicoxa paratype – NMSA-DIP 042100 D Tabanus postacutus paratype – NMSA-DIP 042072.

Current status. Tabanus crocodilinus Austen, 1912; original combination.

Remarks. The publication states there are 17 paratypes – 16 from Malawi and one from Sudan. Five paratypes were donated to the “National Collection” according to the publication – there are six paratypes from Malawi and one from Sudan along with the holotype in the Natural History Museum, London (NHMUK) according to their website. The current locality of the remaining paratypes is unknown. The paratype specimen in KZNM collection is damaged with its abdomen glued to a piece of card pinned below the specimen. It is missing the tarsi of both hind legs and the left wing is slightly damaged.

Tabanus flavicoxa Oldroyd, 1954: 275 fig. 195.

Holotype. Liberia • ♀; Loffa River, Jenne, J. Bequaert; 6°36'4"N, 11°4'26"W; in British Museum (NHMUK).

Paratype. 45 ♀ 1 ♂. 1 ♀ Sierra Leone, Koinadugu District, Jan – Feb 1914, Dr J.S. Pearson; in KwaZulu-Natal Museum. NMSA-DIP 042100 type number 1549. Fig. 10 c.

Current status. Tabanus flavicoxa Oldroyd, 1954; original combination.

Remarks. The publication states that the holotype and all the paratypes are either in the British Museum or the Commonwealth Institute of Entomology. There are no specimens of this species listed on the Natural History Museum, London (NHMUK) website. There is no indication of how the KZNM came to house this paratype. The paratype is in good condition.

Tabanus nefas Usher, 1971: 9 figs 10–13.

Holotype Rhodesia [Zimbabwe] • ♀; Chipinda Pools, Lundi River, S. Rhodesia, March 1963, H. Paterson; NMSA-DIP 031908; 21°18'0"S, 31°55'59"E; type number 1904. Fig. 11.

Figure 11. 

Tabanus nefas holotype A dorsal B lateral C head D ventral. Scale bars: 2 mm.

Current status. Tabanus nefas Usher, 1971; original combination.

Remarks. There are no paratypes listed for this species. The holotype specimen is in poor condition. The head is on a piece of card pinned below the specimen. One flagellum is missing along with two legs and the hind tarsi.

Tabanus postacutus Oldroyd, 1947: 198 figs 1a-c.

Holotype. Sierra Leone • ♀; Daru, September 1912, E.J. Powell, 7°59'30"N, 10°50'26"W; in British Museum, Nat. Hist (NHMUK).

Paratype. Sierra Leone, Daru, September 1912, E.J. Powell; in KwaZulu-Natal Museum NMSA-DIP 042072 type number 370. Fig. 10d.

Current status. Tabanus postacutus Oldroyd, 1947; original combination.

Remarks. There are 231 paratypes listed in the publication. The holotype and a representative series of paratypes were supposed to be deposited in the Natural History Museum in London (NMHUK) but no specimens of this species are listed on their website. The remaining paratypes were deposited in the Imperial Institute of Entomology. There is no indication how the KZNM came to have one of the paratypes. The paratype’s wings are slightly damaged, otherwise it is in good condition.

Tabanus saxicolus Usher, 1965: fig. 6.

Holotype. South Africa • ♀; Royal Natal National Park, Drakensberg Mountains, 13.IX.63, B&P Stuckenberg; NMSA-DIP 053167; 28°41'S, 28°55'E; type number 1903. Fig. 12.

Figure 12. 

Hybomitra saxicolus holotype A dorsal B lateral C wing D head E ventral F–L paratypes F NMSA-DIP 138037 G NMSA-DIP 138038 H NMSA-DIP 138039 I NMSA-DIP 138040 J NMSA-DIP 138041 K NMSA-DIP 138042 L NMSA-DIP 138043. Scale bars: 2 mm.

Paratypes. 5 ♂ Giant’s Castle Reserve, Drakensberg Mountains, 18.9.1961; 2 ♂ Royal Natal National Park, Drakensberg Mountains, 15.9.1963.

Current status. Hybomitra saxicolus (Usher, 1965): transferred to Hybomitra in Williams and Snyman (2024).

Remarks. The type label reads “Tabanus perplexus” suggesting Usher changed the name prior to publication. There is no mention of where the holotype was deposited or any mention of the label data in the publication. There is no mention of paratypes in the publication, but there are seven male paratypes in the KZNM collection. There are several notable differences between the holotype and the paratypes, such as the patterning on the abdomen, the presence of an appendix on R4 of the wings in the males and the colour of the antennae that cast doubt on the holotype and paratypes being of the same species (Williams and Snyman 2024). The holotype is in good condition with the right wing glued onto the thorax. All the paratypes are in good condition.

Tabanus (Therioplectes) zumpti Dias, 1956: 2 fig. 1.

Holotype. South Africa • ♀; Umtamvuna River, 27.11.1950; NMSA-DIP 050132; 31.0667°S, 30.1832°E; type number 371. Fig. 13.

Figure 13. 

Therioplectes zumpti holotype A dorsal B lateral C wing D head E ventral. Scale bars: 2 mm.

Current status. Therioplectes zumpti (Dias, 1956).

Remarks. This species was originally described as a species in the sub-genus, Therioplectes, which was later elevated to genus status. The holotype was deposited in the South African Institute of Medical Research (SAIMR). The Natal Museum (now KZNM) obtained part of the fly collection of the SAIMR by donation in 1983. The label does not indicate a collector, but the publication states Dr F. Zumpt as the collector. The publication lists the locality as “near the Untamura river” which is obviously a transcription error as no such river exists. The specimen is missing one flagellum, otherwise it is in good condition.

Acknowledgements

We thank Daniel Whitmore and Terence Bellingan for assistance in providing literature.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

No funding was reported.

Author contributions

KW - conceptualised, took photos, wrote first daft, edited draft. LS - conceptualised, edited images, edited draft.

Author ORCIDs

Kirstin A. Williams https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5542-6808

Louwrens P. Snyman https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5768-7216

Data availability

All the specimen data is available on GBIF and from the KZNM on request.

References

  • Baldacchino F, Desquesnes M, Mihok S, Foil LD, Duvallet G, Jittapalapong S (2014) Tabanids: Neglected subjects of research, but important vectors of disease agents! Infection, Genetics and Evolution 28: 596–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2014.03.029
  • Baldacchino F, Krčmar S, Bernard C, Manon S, Jay-Robert P (2017) The impact of land use and climate on tabanid assemblages in Europe. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 239: 112–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.01.003
  • Barraclough DA, Whittington AE (1994) Forty years of Diptera studies at the Natal Museum. South African Journal of Science 90: 449–454.
  • Dias JAT (1956) Sabre uma pequena colecao de Tabanideos africanos remetida pelo Dr F. Zumpt. Memorias E Estudos do Museu Zoologico da Universidade de Coimbra 244: 1–36.
  • Karsch F (1887) Bericht uber die durch Herrn Lieutenant Dr. Carl Wilhelm Schmidt in Ost-Afrika gesammelten und von der zoologischen Abtheilung des Koniglichen Museums fur Naturkunde in Berlin erworbenen Diptera. Berliner Entomolog. Zeitschrift 31: 367–382. https://doi.org/10.1002/mmnd.18880310225
  • Linnaeus C (1758) Systema naturae per regna tria naturae: secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis Holmiae, Impensis Direct. Laurentii Salvii, ed. 10, vol. 1, 824 pp. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.542
  • Mackerras IM (1964) The Tabanidae (Diptera) of New Guinea. Pacific Insects 6(1): 69–210.
  • Oldroyd H (1947) A west African horsefly (Dipt., Tabanidae) previously undescribed. Entomologist’s Monthly Magazine 83: 198–199.
  • Oldroyd H (1957) The horseflies of the Ethiopian region. Vol. III. Subfamiles Chrysopsinae, Scepsidinae and Pangoniinae, and a revised classification. British Museum of Natural History, London, xii + 489 pp.
  • Oldroyd H (1952) The Horseflies (Diptera: Tabanidae) of the Ethiopian Region. Volume I. Haematopota and Hippocentrum. British Museum of Natural History, London, 226 pp.
  • Oldroyd H (1954) The Horseflies (Diptera: Tabanidae) of the Ethiopian Region. Volume II. Tabanus and Related Genera. British Museum of Natural History, London, 341 pp.
  • Snyman LP, Neves L, Lempereur L, Bosman AC (2020) Overview of the horseflies (Diptera: Tabanidae) of South Africa: assessment of major collections for spatiotemporal analysis. Austral Entomology 59(3): 549–560. https://doi.org/10.1111/aen.12466
  • Taylor FH (1919) Australian Tabanidae (Dipt.). iv. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 44: 41–71.
  • Travassos Santos Dias JA (1987) Descricao de um novo genero e de uma nova especie de tabanideo (Diptera-Tabanidae) do Sudoeste Africano Bartolomeudiasiella atlanticus n. gen. n. sp. Boletim da Sociedade Portuguesa de Entomologia 3–14(84): 1–8.
  • Travassos Santos Dias JA (1990) Contribuicăo para o conhecimento dos Tabanideos (Diptera-Tabanidae) da África Meridional. Garcia de Orta. Serie de Zoologia, Lisboa 15: 97–124.
  • Usher PJ (1965) Records and descriptions of Tabanidae from Southern Africa (Diptera). Annals of the Natal Museum 18(1): 27–87.
  • Usher PJ (1967) Three new species of Tabanidae from Southern Mrica (Diptera). Annals of the Natal Museum 18(3): 595–606.
  • Usher PJ (1968) New and little-known South African Tabanidae (Diptera). Annals of the Natal Museum 20: 15–36.
  • Usher PJ (1970) Descriptions of two new species of Amanella, and a new record of Tabanus minuscularius Austin (Diptera: Tabanidae). Annals of the Natal Museum 20(2): 329–339.
  • Usher P (1971) New and little-known South African species of Cydistomyia and Tabanus (Diptera: Tabanidae). Annals of the Natal Museum 21: 1–15.
  • Williams KA, Snyman LP (2024) The state of the genus Hybomitra Enderlein (Diptera: Tabanidae) in the Afrotropics including phylogenetic analysis and the description of a new species from South Africa. African Entomology 32: e18615. https://doi.org/10.17159/2254-8854/2024/a18615
  • Williams KA, Smit A, Neves L, Snyman LP (2022) Evaluating the morphological and molecular challenges in identifying the afrotropical Atylotus species (Diptera: Tabanidae). Acta Tropica 226: 106262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2021.106262
  • Zeller PC (1842) Dipterologische Beytrage. Zweyte Abtheilung. Isis (Oken’s) 1842: 807–847.
login to comment